Comments on: Exchange Server 2007 Backup and Recovery http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-server-2007-backup-and-recovery Microsoft Exchange Server News - Tips - Tutorials Mon, 21 May 2012 19:19:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: It Dienstleister Berlin http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-server-2007-backup-and-recovery#comment-2328 It Dienstleister Berlin Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:32:04 +0000 http://www.capslockassassin.com/?p=720#comment-2328 Hilfreicher Artikel. Vielen Dank. Weiter so. MfG Hilfreicher Artikel.
Vielen Dank.
Weiter so.
MfG

]]> By: Exchange server recovery http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-server-2007-backup-and-recovery#comment-1248 Exchange server recovery Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:05:24 +0000 http://www.capslockassassin.com/?p=720#comment-1248 Their might be several reasons behind corruption of exchange server database that causes loss of significant data, its really nice that you have provided adequate knowledge regarding how and for what backup and recovery is necessary. Their might be several reasons behind corruption of exchange server database that causes loss of significant data, its really nice that you have provided adequate knowledge regarding how and for what backup and recovery is necessary.

]]> By: Jens http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-server-2007-backup-and-recovery#comment-1133 Jens Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:02:29 +0000 http://www.capslockassassin.com/?p=720#comment-1133 Nice article, thanks! We are using Microsoft DPM Server to backup exchange. It is working good for us. Nice article, thanks!
We are using Microsoft DPM Server to backup exchange. It is working good for us.

]]> By: Paul http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-server-2007-backup-and-recovery#comment-909 Paul Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:39:27 +0000 http://www.capslockassassin.com/?p=720#comment-909 Hi Mark, thats one approach. There can be disadvantages to that approach though, for example: - uses more (a lot more in some cases) backup capacity than is really required. For a single Exchange server this is probably not much concern, but as you scale up it becomes a cost issue. - if your image based backup is not properly application aware then your recovery options may be limited. For example, ability to recover a single mailbox database, or single mailbox item. Have no experience with StorageCraft Shadow Protect to make any specific comment about it. Hi Mark, thats one approach. There can be disadvantages to that approach though, for example:

- uses more (a lot more in some cases) backup capacity than is really required. For a single Exchange server this is probably not much concern, but as you scale up it becomes a cost issue.

- if your image based backup is not properly application aware then your recovery options may be limited. For example, ability to recover a single mailbox database, or single mailbox item.

Have no experience with StorageCraft Shadow Protect to make any specific comment about it.

]]> By: Mark http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-server-2007-backup-and-recovery#comment-908 Mark Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:50:14 +0000 http://www.capslockassassin.com/?p=720#comment-908 Hi Paul, I've skimmed through your articles, looks like some impressive work you have put together :-) One quesiton though, wouldn't an image backup solution that makes a backup of the whole disk (OS, apps and data files) do a lot of the work already so you don't need to make "backup exceptions" or "things not to forget" ? (We use StorageCraft ShadowProtect http://www.storagecraft.co.uk) Cheers, Mark Hi Paul,

I’ve skimmed through your articles, looks like some impressive work you have put together :-)

One quesiton though, wouldn’t an image backup solution that makes a backup of the whole disk (OS, apps and data files) do a lot of the work already so you don’t need to make “backup exceptions” or “things not to forget” ? (We use StorageCraft ShadowProtect http://www.storagecraft.co.uk)

Cheers,
Mark

]]>